Human nature is a strange thing. It really is. We learn that we can turn to somebody who is better versed in a particular field if we get stuck with something they may know more about. In fact, many times, they've made it known how they prefer to be approached. Whether it's via e-mail, IM, telephonically, mailing lists, forums, etc. (Obviously telephonical contact is generally limited).
Armed now with this information, a person (let's call him Jim - Bob would get offended here) decides he's now stuck and needs help. Firstly, Jim sits staring at a screen for an inordinate amount of time waiting for something to happen. While he may thing nothings happening, in fact, many things are:
Armed now with this information, a person (let's call him Jim - Bob would get offended here) decides he's now stuck and needs help. Firstly, Jim sits staring at a screen for an inordinate amount of time waiting for something to happen. While he may thing nothings happening, in fact, many things are:
- He's forgetting exactly what sequence of actions led him to this impasse.
- His brain is recovering for actually briefly having to do some work.
- The 'problem' he has, may or may not be affecting other users.
- If the 'expert' is actually related - i.e. a company internal relationship - an 'expert' may (if he/she has seen the 'problem') be taking bets with his fellow 'experts' as to how long it'll take Jim to ask for help. This just lowers the opinion of Jim in the 'experts' opinion.
Invariably, the following sequence of events is one of the inevitable outcomes:
- No mail comes from Jim, instead, Jim tries calling another of the 'experts'. This just ends up making Jim less worthwhile than a fly in the 'experts' eyes - as Jim is now becoming a pest.
- Jim sends a mail - an hour later. The 'expert' that Jim "spoke" to has probably run off to a meeting now, or perhaps even gone home for the day.
- Jim gets impatient that his query hasn't been answered immediately (even though its nowjover an hour since his initial call - its only 2 minutes since his mail).
- Jim throws his toys and runs off to his manager crying.
- Jim's manager gets peed off and calls the 'expert's' manager.
- The 'expert's' manager tells Jim's manager where Jim went wrong with the process, and Jim's manager extends this newfound knowledge back to Jim.
- An 'expert' reads Jim's mail and it says something along the lines of "I have a problem". Not "I have a problem with this and that when I do this and something else". Just "I have a problem".
- A painful exchange back and forth between the 'expert' and Jim regarding the nature and extent of the problem.
- Finally, once the 'expert' understands the problem - he resolves it in two minutes. This now 2 hours 37 minutes after the first phone call.
Honestly. If you want help - help the helper.
Don't just assume that the 'expert' is a mind-reader amongst his/her other skills. There are plenty of resources on the web which can assist and teach just how to approach this type of issue. As in How to Ask Questions the Smart Way and How to Report Bugs Effectively. (These can be applied to life in general - they don't have to be strictly computer/software related)Of course, this brings up some valuable issues, like if Jim had been able to read, he would have found his issue dealt with in black and white (and possibly screenshots, too) on the FAQ. So, STFW and RTFM, eh?
Yeah right. If Jim and his buddies could read, the 'expert' and his colleagues wouldn't have jobs.
Sad but true.
Sigh.